<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMSing does not affect children&#8217;s use of grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrbarlow.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/smsing-does-not-affect-childrens-use-of-grammar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrbarlow.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/smsing-does-not-affect-childrens-use-of-grammar/</link>
	<description>A Bunch of Interesting Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:01:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashanam</title>
		<link>http://mrbarlow.wordpress.com/2012/09/10/smsing-does-not-affect-childrens-use-of-grammar/#comment-9676</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ashanam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2012 21:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrbarlow.wordpress.com/?p=7849#comment-9676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s interesting, because just a few weeks ago, I read of the results of a study that said it did.  Correlation was looked for in a different way: number of text messages was correlated with not being able to recognize or correct errors in grammar.  I guess we&#039;ll just have to see.  (I wish I could remember where I saw the report published.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, because just a few weeks ago, I read of the results of a study that said it did.  Correlation was looked for in a different way: number of text messages was correlated with not being able to recognize or correct errors in grammar.  I guess we&#8217;ll just have to see.  (I wish I could remember where I saw the report published.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
